Sands and Diplomacy
It
was in Jalore, a remote district in South-western Rajasthan where this fine idea
invaded my neurons.The idea which will be developed and revealed gradually like
a muddy stream flowing in it’s deltaic stage, has a bearing on the future of
the political commen-sense (if anything of this sort should at all be thought
about ). Jalore falls in geographical region which is historically known as
Marwar.Infact it is one of the sub-region of Marwar called Godwad.The region is
uniquely adorable for it’s Raikas with 50 meter long pagdis and thousands of
sheeps,it’s jungle temples frequented my merchant like milk loving bears,jain
sadhus and sleepy babus in their vintage lal battis.The marriage which I was
attending was one of the typical feudal marriage of Rajasthan with it’s Langa
performances,got (meat eating feast with buckets of whisky), rajput thikanedars
with their big mustaches poorly hiding the vanishing finances and old glories.
There, I came across many people.Some of them were quite intresting like
the hawala seth(much like mirchi seth from sarfarosh), local MLA(who wanted U.S
to put a bounty on Anna Hazare’s head). I am not going to write anything about
these intresting ones but I am going to discuss the one who was the most
unpleasing or rather irritating one but who planted a great idea in my mind.I
begin with a great thanks to him.
He
was an IFS officer with 7 years of diplomatic experience. For obvious reasons I
am not going to divulge his name but he was an Indian diplomat who began his
conversation with a complain that since he was IFS he won’t get a good dowry
vis-à-vis. IAS officers of his community.That really kicked me.I wanted to hear
more and talk more.
I
initiated a discussion on public policy and public diplomacy.He replied that
“public is always a public. It can not have a policy and it is not just capable
of doing diplomacy.”Initially I thought that it was some piece of diplomatic
wit but soon it turned out that it was a piece of scattered wit.He meant it
literally. He had no idea of public diplomacy.Then I told him that since
he was living in global world he should have an account on twitter. He replied
that last time he wrote any sensible thing was 7 years back when he wrote an essay
on women empowerment in his IAS exam. I said well that is so cool. Even 7 years
back you were thinking about women empowerment, in those days no one thought
about gender issues.He was on 7th heaven to learn that. He asked
me,”Does that make him a suitable candidate for MP election ?” I shot
back,”when are you standing for that ?”He said with a natural ease,”after
retirement”.I said ,but that is like some 30 years from now and till then it
must be diplomacy,not politics.He says well diplomacy began with his coaching
classes in Mukarjee nagar and ended the day he got his appointment letter.
Later,when
I mentioned names like Jagat Mehta,Samuel Huntington, Francis Fukuyama, Pratap
Bhanu Mehta,they were like physics and chemistry formulas for him. He said I
don’t know calculus.I said ,they are great public policy experts. Jagat Mehta is
from your state .You must know him.He only said one sentence,”In sab bekar ki
baton me kya rakha hai.jab upsc ke exam me inke bare me nahi padha to ab kya
zarurat hai. Exam ke baad to maine newspaper bhi padhna band kar diya.”He was
least interested in knowing anything about Amitav Ghosh,Gabriel Garcia
Marquez.He could not speak for 2 minites fluently in English. But yes he was
making a good reading out of Playboy which he brought in loads for his cousins
from his foreign postings and was regaling his friends and cousins with his
escapades with blonde girls.The only virtue which he had was that he was not
arrogant and bossy like other babus.He could drink the lowliest of wine and
call it Johnny walker.
Today
morning a batchmate for St.Stephens’s called me up from U.S.He did MSFS(Masters of Science in Foreign Service)
from Georgetown and was thinking of joining Indian Foreign Service.He asked me
about the UPSC exam.I told him that it is something which goes on for two-three
years and it is capable of failing Henry Kissinger in International Relations
as optional. He asked me that is there any system of recruitment based on
interview,SOP or lateral entry in civil services .Infact he found it quite
funny .He said he is already a graduate in foreign service and his degree is
the best one.He said,” I am not interested in taking this exam as I already
have an offer from Brookings Institution.I just want to serve my country but
not at this big a cost.”I said good bye and hungup the phone.
Today
evening, he rang me up once again and announced his decision that he is joining
Brookings institution. I am not very happy to learn about this.He could have
been an asset to this nation if he had joined our diplomatic services. But we do
not have anything for these people and this makes them land up in U.N and
Brookings because the later two know their worth.Our system just does not go
beyond conventions,customs ,rigid exams (which makes diplomats and
administrators out of engineers,docters,linguists and historians)
Why can’t we
begin with some change? When U.S can appoint Vali nasr,Francis Fukuyama ,Brett
Mcgerc as policy advisors and ambassadors than why can’t we send our Ved Pratap
Vedics,Brahma Chellanys,Achin Vinayaks,Narayan murthys etc as our envoys and
high commissioners.We can give a chance to Indian students (interested ones) who go and study public policy and
diplomacy cources at places like Cornell, Princeton, Fletcher, Harvard etc to join
our civil services and foreign services.There is no need to subject them to
UPSC exam (as most of them already have good job. offers from MNCs,think tanks
etc so we have to somehow get this talent)They can simply write an SOP and then
shortlisted candidate should be called for an interview.Finally selected
candidates can start with a 6 month orientation course and then parcelled to
their foreign postings or field postings in India (if they are in administrative
services).Thes students are professionals with a good exposure, knowledge,and
dynamic personality.They can do a great service to our country.
Recently Farid
Zakaria raised a big question mark on our foreign policy and our whole foreign service set up. He wrote
that a nation as small as New Zealand has 11,000 diplomats and on the other
hand India ,who dreams of game changer role has only 600 diplomats.So ,I
believe it is the right time to think out of the box and get Kissingers and
Bismarcks for India.
Finally it
is our choice,who do we want to represent us ?
a)The fellow who cremated the diplomacy the day he was appointed (after
passing a great,great and greatest exam!)
OR
b) the fellow from Georgetown for whom diplomacy is a passion,mission of his life ,not just receipt for good dowry.
OR
b) the fellow from Georgetown for whom diplomacy is a passion,mission of his life ,not just receipt for good dowry.
If we do this,some fucking idiotic politician will get his son appointed as foreign secretary using same pull that he uses currently to get him a medical seat in govt. colleges.
ReplyDeleteI think the article makes a lot of sense. Even if you want to test someone, a specialist exam with more relevant things should be devised. For majority of the aspirants, the motivation to clear UPSC comes more from the respect and adulation that will follow, than from the prspect of serving their nation. Even if there are ideas of serving the nation they are shattered by the beck-breaking exams.
ReplyDelete